Home
South Azerbaijan
Arts & Culture
History
Literature
Women
Politics
Society
With You
Archive
About Us

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

فارسی

 

 “KIRKUK… RUNNING TOWARDS THE CLIFF RAPIDLY”

 

          Akrem Alfi/Ahmed al Mansuri

When you land at the airport in the city of Irbil located in the north of Iraq and wander around through its narrow roads, you could not realize at first glance that you are in Iraq. In the region of Kurdistan, the regional flag took the place of the national flag of Iraq. In Kurdistan, not only destroyed buildings are not seen but also new buildings symbolizing the on-going development could be observed. However, it should not be forgotten that this region is still a part of the Arabian world. When you walk around on the streets of Kurdistan, you would think that you are in heaven. However, the conflicts existing for a century turned this heaven into “a delayed paradise”.

 

In fact, we made this trip to see what is going on in the Iraqi Kurdistan. We are here in Kurdistan to portray the most possible truth about this region whose name is frequently declared in the newspapers and on the televisions. The President of Iraq and the   Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani, in a statement he issued about the Kirkuk file, declared that “One should be careful when they perform an operation on an organ of the body; however we are talking about Kirkuk, a brain surgery.”

 

After the interviews made with many Arabian politicians and intellectuals, we came to a conclusion that: “Kirkuk is running towards the cliff rapidly.” “Kirkuk will be the focus of the news tomorrow.” We would hear the name of Kirkuk in the following months frequently depending on the fact that this city could not be shared. On one hand, the Kurds asks for a referendum to be held before the New Year in the city to annex the Kurdistan region. On the other hand, Turkmen and Arabs are against a referendum held on Kirkuk. Moreover, there exists a powerful neighboring country like Turkey that is opposed to the changes in its legal situation in Kirkuk. “Kirkuk… a new war for oil.” Because of the fact that Kirkuk has 12% of the Iraqi oil, the political conflicts in the region could turn out to be a violent war. “Kirkuk… a new and difficult file.” One should be very careful talking about the file of Kirkuk. Every word uttered on this issue should be chosen very carefully due to its sensitivity. Anyway, it is “a brain surgery.”

 

The War in the Future

 

A youth called Salim, enumerated the scenarios about the reasons for the beginning of the war as follows: “The war could broke out when a Kurdish young man makes a pass at a young Arabian or Turkmen girl, or when the flag of the Iraq Kurdistan Region waved in a district mostly settled down by the Turkmen, or when a conflict breaks out between the Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs, or during or after the referendum held for identifying the status of Kirkuk. The city of Kirkuk which existed five thousand years ago is the center of the tension experienced both in Iraq and in the region now. Most probably this tension could be a “spark” for a civil war or a new war that can break out in the region at any moment. Depending on its strategic location, Kirkuk staged so many wars throughout history. This city has experienced demographic changes for many times till now. In Kirkuk some dramatic changes have been experienced, since there is oil in the city and because of the fact that Turkmen had immigrated to this city in which the Kurds are living. After the Baath Party came into the power, it has begun to change the demographic structure of the city depending on the conflict it is experiencing with the Kurds. The Baath Party encouraged the Arab families to come to the city of Kirkuk in accordance with its plan of change.

 

The Demographic War

 

According to the numbers presented by the Kurdistan Regional Administration, 65% of the population in Kirkuk was consisted by the Kurds in 1920s. The administration stated that although this rate of the Kurdish population decreased to 48% in 1950s and 37% in 1970s, the rate of the Turkmen population increased to 16.3% in 1970s while it was 4.8% in 1920s. The Kurdish administration noted that the same fact is valid for the Arabs as well and that the rate had increased from 20% to 44%. The Kurdish Regional Administration pointed out that while there observed an increase in the number of the Arabs and the Turkmen, there experienced at least a 75% decrease in the number of Assyrian, Syriac and Chaldean who constitutes 10% of the Kirkuk population. The portrait of Kirkuk today is a secret and it is unknown. Depending on the unofficial sources, it is seen that Turkmen constitutes the majority, Arabs 35% and the Kurds just 30% of the Kirkuk’s population. The Kurds, who do not accept these numbers, claim that they constitute at least 50% of the Kirkuk population and they present the 2005 elections as a proof for this. On the contrary, the Turkmen and the Arabs said that the Arabs and the Turkmen did not vote in the 2005 elections whereas the Kurds who did not live in Kirkuk came to the city in the elections in order to vote.

 

The population, which is covered by a political and strict wrap and which is very problematic, actually reflects the conflict between the ethnic groups in the city, which could become violent in the future. All the groups in Kirkuk declared that they are the holder of the rights. The Kurds never leaves the idea that Kirkuk has been a part of Kurdistan throughout history while the Turkmen remains insisted in their rights on Kirkuk since they constitutes the majority of the population there and  Mosul has been a Turkmen city throughout history. Besides this, the Arabs observes that they come face to face with a strong “demographic war” which is conducted by the Kurds who endeavor to deport them and who have many supporters who could be exploited to change the demographic structure of Kirkuk. Even the Assyrians and Chaldeans claim rights for the city because they have been living in these territories for three thousand years before Arabs, Turkmen and Kurds.

 

The establishment of parties based on the ethnical groups in all cities of Iraq, including Kirkuk triggered this tension. In the statements of politicians it can be clearly seen that they want to take the ethnical groups to their side by using the incidents in the region. Violent acts in Kirkuk have increased since the second half of 2007. Kirkuk became the center of violence, explosion and kidnap. What is more dangerous than the acts of terror in Kirkuk is the internal tension. Kirkuk came to a point that the ethnical groups in the city are waiting to light a fire which will not go out easily. What will trigger this fire is that the powerful states possess “the gas” in their hand.

 

Turkey considers Kirkuk as “a pearl” that will complete “the necklace” of the state of Kirkuk. The government of Ankara is in the opinion that while many Kurds live in the Turkish territories it will be difficult to silence the Kurds living in those territories and there will be a chance for the Kurds to declare their independence following the establishment of a Kurdish state. Turkey has political, demographic and geographical extensions in Kirkuk. At this stage the Turkish officials consider full derange of Kirkuk from its orbit as a thin red line that should not be crossed and their most important opportunity is “Turkmen”. Turkey’s stance on Kirkuk is very clear. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan states that a referendum should not be held in Kirkuk before the control is gained over Kirkuk.  Syria explicitly states that they are against the establishment of a new Kurdish state very close to them. According to a Kurdish official Syria supports insurgent Arabs and Islamic groups to prevent Kirkuk to be annexed to the Kurdish region and let the city stay as a red-hot cinder.

 

Are the Kurdish politicians lying?

 

A young named Mohammad talks in a loud voice like he is in a meeting as, “We will take Kirkuk back no matter how long it takes. We will establish our state against all difficulties that will be raised.” All Kurds speak in a loud voice like Mohammad. Their dream of establishing a state is based clearly on “taking Kirkuk back”. Some Kurds state that Kirkuk is the centerpiece of the Kurdish state which will be established in the future. In response the Kurdish politicians do not comment on this logic and claim a different idea. Starting from the lowest to the highest government officials in the Kurdish administration you can often hear these words: “Kirkuk is a city of Iraq but in the appearance of Kurdistan”. Dr. Mohammad Ihsan who is the Minister of External Regions in the Kurdish Government states as: “Kirkuk is an integral part of Kurdistan. There are Arabs, Turkmen, Assyrians and Chaldeans besides the Kurds in this city.” Other Kurdish official states it is crystal clear from the 2005 elections that Kirkuk is a Kurdish city. However Kirkuk is not only a geographical extension of the Kurdistan region in the map drawn only by the Kurds but also the main oil reserve. Oil is the main code of the discussions on this region that can not be shared by the Iraqis.

 

Mohammad Ihsan told in his brief statement to Al Ittihad as: “We don’t care about the oil in Kirkuk. The oil will be distributed according to the relevant laws regarding this issue. Oil belongs to all Iraqis.” This statement, which was reiterated twice by Ihsan, was also reiterated by the deputy leader of the Kurdish Regional Government Omar Fettah Hussein and some Kurdish officials in a different way but in the same essence. After our talks with the Kurdish officials we were not convinced that the unique aim of the dream on the independence of Kurdistan is not to possess the oil of Kirkuk. Now let’s get back to the speech of Mohammad Ihsan as: “Iraqi oil belongs to all Iraqis. The oil of Kirkuk belongs to all but we are talking about a Kirkuk without oil”. Did he really mean what he says or is it just a political statement for the press? Hamid Mustafa, 34, who we came across on the streets of Irbil while searching for an easier response to our question continued as: “it is our national right to have a state of our own like everyone else. Politicians hesitate to state this because of their special interests but we cannot accept anything less than a Kurdish state with the capital of Kirkuk in the future.”

 

Many commentators state that a Kurdish state can not be established without Kirkuk theoretically. Not any state can be established without a strong economy. At least it fulfills the condition of a strong economy theoretically. It is understood that all methods show one result which is an “explosion”. The only thing that will prevent this explosion is wise, intelligent leaders with a strategic vision. It is impossible to find the leaders possessing those qualities in Iraq now.

 

Arabization and Kurdization

 

Due to the overthrow of the Baath regime in April 2003 the power balance in northern Iraq has changed dramatically. The two major Kurdish parties in Iraq; Patriotic Union of Iraqi Kurdistan led by Jalal Talabani and Democratic Party of Iraqi Kurdistan led by Masud Barzani, considered the incidents in Iraq an opportunity to take Kurdistan under their control and to take primarily Kirkuk, which is considered as the “heart” of the region, and all regions that are part of Kurdistan back. Due to their positions in the transitional government Masud Barzani and Jalal Talabani succeeded to pass the 58th article of the Constitution. This article led to the return of the migrated Kurds back to Kirkuk. Before the elections in 2005, in a period when Arabs refused to vote in the elections, the migrated Kurds were made to vote in order to seize Kirkuk. Kurds managed to get 59 % of the votes in the parliamentary elections for the constituency of Kirkuk. In other words, while Kurds got 26 out of 41 chairs, Turkmen were able to get 9 and Sunni Arabs 6 chairs. Thus, it became clear that Kurdish leaders had the aim of seizing Kirkuk by remaining in the political process in Iraq. Kurds included article 140, related with the status of Kirkuk, into the constitution, which makes up the subject on which the Kurds had been most successful from the political point of view.

 

Adnan Mufti, Speaker of the National Assembly of Iraqi Kurdistan, spoke to the daily Al Ittihad: “We accepted article 140 in order to give an end to the intrigues about the Kurds. Those who oppose this article or want it to be amended are malicious people”. In this statement, Mufti referred to the Turkmen Front and those Arabs in Iraq who oppose this article. Within the framework of  the efforts of the Kurds to annex Kirkuk to the Kurdistan Region, those Kurds who had been forced to migrate by the overthrown leader Saddam Hussein are made return through the efforts sustained in the city “to make people Kurdish” or, as Kurdish officials say, “to have normalization”. Turkmen and Arabs said that Kurds were settled in the villages through their money and with the assistance of foreign governments. Turkmen and Arabs expressed that the returning Kurds were placed in the vicinity of the airport in Kirkuk and in the east of the city.

 

According to unofficial sources, approximately 300 thousand Kurds returned Kirkuk since 2003. Kurdish officials reported that about 200 thousand Kurdish families had been forced to migrate during the Saddam era and there were still 80 thousand families waiting to return Kirkuk. According to the Turkmen and Arabs, on the other hand, the number of Kurdish families that had been forced to migrate during the Saddam era does not exceed 10 thousand. Arabs and Turkmen accused Kurds of seizing the significant positions in Kirkuk and facilitating the arrival of Kurds in this city. Various Iraqi Arab officials expressed that Kurds took their supporters to Kirkuk with a view to have the referendum, which will determine the status of Kirkuk, result in their favor. If the referendum, scheduled for late 2007 in Kirkuk, results in Kurds’ favor, this means they will get stronger in the region in political, economic and geographic terms. Thus, in order to achieve this aim, it is needed to take Kurds to Kirkuk and make some progress on the way to change the demography of the city.

 

Strategic Position

 

Kirkuk has a strategic position. Kirkuk is the city which links Suleymaniyah, Irbil and Baghdad to one another. Also the main roads linking the regional provinces of Kurdistan join in Kirkuk. The Kurdistan Regional Government gets the main three contact points by seizing Kirkuk. One of these contact points opens to Baghdad, the second one to Iran and the third one to Syria.

 

 Small Iraq

 

It is estimated that Kirkuk’s population is about 1.5 million. Almost 800 thousand people are living only in the center of Kirkuk. Turkmen started to migrate to Kirkuk in the twenties with the discovery of oil. Arabs, Turkmen, Kurds, Chaldeans, Yazidis and Assyrians have been living for centuries along the border region which separates the Iraqi Kurdistan Region from the other provinces of Iraq. This region, which is considered as a small Iraq consisting of Arabs, Sunnis, Shiites, Yazidis and Christians, in fact represents the “Mosaic” of great Iraq.

 

 Password… Oil

 

There are six oil beds in Kirkuk. This involves the oil bed which is considered the greatest oil bed of Iraq. This bed has 12 % of the Iraqi oil reserves, i.e. there are 13.5 billions of barrels of oil. On the other hand, the oil in the Kurdistan Region makes up only the three percent of the Iraqi oil reserves. The oil in the oil beds in Kirkuk is known by its abundance and quality. (United Arab Emirates / daily Al Ittihad – November 5, 2007)

 

 

 

info@oursouthazerbaijan.com

 
Home South Azerbaijan

Arts & Culture

History Literature Women Politics Society With You Archive About Us


Our South Azerbaijan © 2006   • Privacy Policy