آذربایجان جنوبی ما

 
Home
Arts & Culture
Society
With You
Archive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

فارسی

 

WHY DOES TALABANI TAKE AFTER SADDAM?

 

The expected meeting between Iran and USA which initially had been scheduled for 18 December was postponed to another date. Then rumors popped up implying that the meeting would not be held at all. The statements by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani following the postponement of the event and turning into an ambiguous future occasion, mounted tension between Iran and Iraq. Talabani, out of nowhere, declared that the agreement signed in 1975 that sets the River Arvand as the border line between Iran and Iraq is void.

 

In his statement of 24 December, Talabani said the mentioned agreement was signed during the rule of Shah and Saddam which now made it null and void as both regimes had by now collapsed. As known, the Agreement of Algeria was signed in the capital city of Algeria in 1975 in the aftermath of intensive conflicts between Iraq and Iran, high tension at the borders and casualties by both sides.

 

According to the Agreement of Algeria which brought a solution to the Shatt Al-Arab matter, Iran was required to discontinue supporting the Kurds whereas Iraq was to expel Ayatollah Khomeini. The Agreement of Algeria signed by Saddam Hussein in the capacity of deputy-president entailed that half of the Gulf was to be owned by Iran whereas the other would belong to Iraq. The Shatt Al Arab waterway, which is comprised of the merged Rivers of Tigris and Euphrates, makes up the Iraq’s southern border with Iran. Shatt Al Arab is the only point where Iraq can open up to Persian Gulf. The right to sovereignty over Shatt Al Arab, an approximately 200-km. channel formed at the point where Rivers Tigris and Euphrates unite, was one of the reasons that triggered the Iran-Iraq war. At that time, Iran supported the Kurds led by Barzani and thus obliged Saddam to recognize the sovereignty of Iran over River Arvand. The Iraqi Baathist Regime considered the signing of this agreement as an insult, made wise use of the Iranian Revolution 1979 and Saddam tore this agreement document into pieces on a TV programme a couple of days before his intervention into Iran. After the 8-year futile Iraq-Iran War which started on 22 September 1980 and brought no good upon either of the countries, Saddam recognized Iran’s border rights and wrote a letter to Rafsanjani, the then president of Iran, where he acknowledged the validity of the Agreement of Algeria signed in 1975.

 

By almost following the footsteps of Saddam, which balances of the region does Talabani want to shake today? To whom would such declarations and claims of Talabani delivered at such a sensitive time serve?

 

To whose interests would this abrupt move serve? A move which reminds of the tragedy which lasted eight years, killed hundreds of thousands of people, devastated Iraq, set the ground to later commit all kinds of humanity crimes including chemical massacres… A tragedy launched by the USA using Saddam Hussain as a tool to crush Iranian Revolution, financed by Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries and ended with the execution of Saddam and occupation of the country…

 

Should this agreement is considered void, this will mean that another front of conflict will be opened only to be added to the already existing problem of Greater Tonb, Lesser Tonb and Abumusa Islands among Gulf Arabs as well as the Strait of Hormoz.

 

The main reason of such a war is indeed more complicated than it looks. First of all, it is again all about sovereignty which triggered the Iraq’s occupation of Kuwait, a consequence of British policy towards Basra. Kuwait was occupied because Iraq had blocked its way out to the Persian Gulf. The grounds for the Agreement of Algeria is, however, more complicated and might better help in shedding light upon what happens today. Why did Saddam sign this agreement in the first place and tore it apart later?

 

Here is why:

Israel, while battling against the armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan at the same time during the Arab-Israel War in 1967, together with the Iran’s Shah, began to provide military support to the Kurds of northern Iraq. Heavy weapons brought from Israel to Iran were transported to northern Iraq by land while Israeli intelligence agents and officers were transferred to the region through the same route and trained the Kurdish troops. The Israeli officers commanding the troops of Barzani launched severe attacks against Baghdad. Approximately one hundred Israeli officers operating in the region decided on war tactics while at the same time they directly commanded the war. They picked up those they assessed as talented and sent them to Israel for military training.

 

But why did Israel, already squeezed amidst such a huge war, do that? The motivation was of course not Israel’s affection towards Kurds. The main target was Baghdad…More accurately; Israel indeed sought to prevent the Kurdish troops to join the United Arab army fighting against Israel. And as a matter of fact, it did achieve! Iraqi army managed to provide only a very limited support to United Arab armies. It had to pile up all its forces in northern Iraq. A total of ten thousand Iraqi soldiers died in this war. Israel accomplished its goal. Iran’s Shah himself started the discussion on partitioning Iraq right at the same time.

 

Baghdad accepted to compromise with Tehran so as to block Iran’s support and, indirectly Israel’s backing to northern Iraq. Iraq acknowledged Iran’s claims on Shatt Al Arab waterway. Iran had to discontinue supporting Kurds in return. Israel had thus reached its aim. So had Iran. Eventually, support pouring into northern Iraq either stopped or decreased. Iranian revolution proved to be a significant move in breaking the US influence in the region. The revolution totally disrupted all balances of the region. The US-Iranian alliance collapsed. Saddam Hussein’s only reason to attack Iran was not the conflicts among two countries. It was also a part of US desire to punish Iran and regain control in the region. Accordingly, Saddam was cocked and fired. A bloody war took place with the financial support of Sunnite countries and the military and political support of America. The plan was to hammer down the revolution right when it started. Yet the complete contrary happened. With the Iraq-Iran War, the subsequent Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the First Gulf War and the occupation today, Iraq committed suicide. Actually, it was pushed to commit suicide.

 

Another reason why Jalal Talabani made these statements almost as a copycat of Saddam might also be an attempt to draw all the attention as the first non-Arab president to rule Iraq. At this point, everything apparently depends on the Iraqi government. It seems that everyone is ready to forget about this adventure if the Iraqi leadership quits discussing the Agreement of Algeria. Nonetheless, their confirmation of the invalidity of the agreement will mark the start of a new tension between the two countries and within the region where, in this case, one would reasonably expect a political strife among the countries.

 

The observers remind that the bloody Iraq-Iran War, started in 1980 and led hundreds of thousands of people to die and millions more to emigrate, broke up for no apparent reason and evaluate this recent move by Talabani as a new phase in USA’s nuclear pressure strategy upon Iran. Underlining that the statements by Talabani who attributes considerable importance at improving the relations with Iran after Saddam Hussein was toppled, had an interesting tinge, the observers note that Talabani might have made this unexpected statement under the pressure of USA which, after the latest intelligence estimate, had to opt out the military operation towards Iran. The evaluations indicate that US, instead of directly attacking Iran, seeks to justify the operation by creating a de facto situation. The estimate by 16 intelligence organizations had an enormous negative impact on George Bush administration. Thus, US opted out the military option including military intervention in Iran. The world has now acknowledged Iran’s arguments and Tehran, thus, won the nuclear struggle. The same estimate led to panic in Israel and the region witnessed the start of a new game with Talabani being the leading star.

 

 

info@oursouthazerbaijan.com

 
Home

Arts & Culture

Society With You Archive


Our South Azerbaijan © 2006   • Privacy Policy